Breaking: Unions lose in fresh Supreme Court decision

Mandatory union dues in the public sector have been slammed in a 5-4 ruling released just this morning

A 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court this morning found in favor of Illinois home-care providers who challenged their mandatory union dues.

The Harris v. Quinn case came close to overturning Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, which allowed public sector unions to impose fees on non-members. It was the same precedent that allowed the Illinois regulatory scheme requiring the workers in question to pay union fees in the first place.
 

You might also like: Did these companies go too far to discourage unionization?


In 1977, Abood found public employees could be required to pay union fees even if they weren’t a member, as long as they did not have to pay any portion of fees that covers political activity.

However, here the court drew a distinction between “full-fledged public employees” and “partial public” ones, saying the health workers in this case were merely partial public. The employees in question were not directly employed by the government, but instead were reimbursed through Illinois’ Medicaid program.
 

You might also like: Hundreds of NLRB decisions could be invalid

Recent articles & video

Mercado Libre to hire about 18,000 people: reports

'Terrifying' trend: Over 11 million malware attacks recorded globally in past 4 years

AI may speed up recruitment – but it won’t get any easier

Where are the best destinations for remote workers in 2024?

Most Read Articles

Remote work to blame for Nike's innovation slowdown, says CEO

McKinsey & Co. to lay off over 300 employees: reports

Novartis to cut over 600 jobs amid global restructuring