Put the FitBit down: why you shouldn’t use wearables to monitor employees’ health

Wearable technology is a growing trend, and one many employers are considering introducing, but Suzanne Lucas - better known as the Evil HR Lady - says it's a step too far

I wear a FitBit and compete with my friends for the most number of steps each week. But, it’s only a friendly competition and meant only to encourage us to be a bit healthier. But what if it wasn’t friends encouraging friends, but your boss? And the reward wasn’t the satisfaction of knowing you walked 10,000 more steps than Karen and Eleanora, but that your health insurance premiums were lower?

No one wants to pay more for health insurance premiums, but is using wearable devices to monitor your employees’ health really a good option?

Some companies think so. Forbes reports that petroleum giant BP uses FitBit data to grant discounts on health insurance rates. And we’ve reported on companies like Global Corporate Challenge that will help you set up competitions among employees to encourage their overall “wellness.”

Some people love it. Especially those who get to shell out less cash for health insurance. But, there is a dark side to the collection and use of all this data. Here’s why you should reconsider (literally) tracking your employees every step: evilhrlady.org.

Recent articles & video

Mercado Libre to hire about 18,000 people: reports

'Terrifying' trend: Over 11 million malware attacks recorded globally in past 4 years

AI may speed up recruitment – but it won’t get any easier

Where are the best destinations for remote workers in 2024?

Most Read Articles

Remote work to blame for Nike's innovation slowdown, says CEO

McKinsey & Co. to lay off over 300 employees: reports

Novartis to cut over 600 jobs amid global restructuring