Cheerleaders take employers to court over wages, diets and 'jiggle tests'

by |
Cheerleading isn’t quite the world of glamor and money that it may have seemed, recent lawsuits have revealed. Female cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills and Oakland Raiders have sued their employers under misclassification and minimum wage laws, revealing employee guidelines that seem highly unusual, if not illegal.

Cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills were subjected to weekly “Jiggle Tests”, the lawsuit revealed. Women were asked to perform jumping jacks while team coaches evaluated their bodies for jiggling fat. Too much jiggle and a cheerleader could be warned, penalized, suspended or even dismissed.

Twenty pages of guidelines instruct Bills’ cheerleaders on proper conduct, including appropriate topics to converse on, how to be diplomatic, and what sort of hair and makeup is appropriate. Where it gets extreme is when it instruct employees on who to socialize with (no Bills football players), and how to handle their intimate areas: “[Menstrual] products can be changed at least every 4 hours. Except when sleeping, they can be left in for the night.”

Despite all this, the cheerleaders were classified as independent contractors, and paid per game, meaning that if a girl was deemed too “jiggly” to play most games, she could earn as little as $150 a season. Nevertheless, they’re expected to attend practices, charity events, and at least 20 other appearances per season – many of which are unpaid.

Meanwhile in California, Oakland’s Raiderettes are also suing under minimum wage laws, as well as laws that dictate that employees must be allowed to discuss their wages and must be offered meal breaks for shifts longer than eight hours. The Raiderettes were paid $125 a game in the 2013-2014 season, which comprises about nine hours’ work on game day, as well as about nine hours of rehearsals per week, and countless public appearances, which may or may not be paid. Like the Bills’ cheerleaders, they were not paid if they were deemed “too soft” in the belly to perform on game day.

The cases are proceeding through California and New York courts.
  • Angel on 5/2/2014 10:32:25 AM

    The teams know they've violated the laws; that's why they increased the season stipend for the season in an attempt to appease current cheerleaders. While all the guidelines are reasonable in this industry (former dancer), the girls are grossly underpaid and misclassified as independent contractors.

  • HR Human on 5/2/2014 10:14:00 AM

    I can understand the requirements for the way you look and dress, and even who to socialize with, but the amount of money they make is a shame.
    The cheerleaders are part of the public image of the team. They represent the team to the media and fans, at games and at local events. They deserve to make at least a living wage. While I disagree on a fundamental moral level with careers that trade specifically on women's faces and bodies, if you are going to have cheerleaders, at least pay them more than a stripper would make.

  • Paulette on 5/2/2014 9:43:11 AM

    The NFL has lots of money to pay their players, but the cheerleaders get basically nothing for pay. My daughter was going to try out for the MN Vikings (a beautiful, tall, blonde, blue-eyed and built well young woman) until she found out she wouldn't be paid for her time.

  • Sarah on 5/2/2014 7:40:24 AM

    In this line of work, this is all reasonable.

  • Thoughtful on 5/2/2014 5:45:35 AM

    Where was the HR partner for these teams...?

HRD America forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Name (required)
Comment (required)
By submitting, I agree to the Terms & Conditions