The number of job applicants looking to complete online assessments on their smart phones and tablets is on the rise – but could HR be missing out on a potential star employee as a result?
Globally, mobile phones are more popular than basic sanitation – according to the United Nations, 6.6 billion people have mobiles, while only 4.5 billion have a toilet.
That means more jobseekers will be looking to use mobile technology for the job application process Australian recruiters are among the most likely in the world to embrace it, according to recent research.
But allowing job candidates to do online assessments on their mobile devices could lead to potential problems.
Advisory company CEB’s Global Assessment Trends Report showed that 59% of recruiters in Australia and New Zealand would support the use of mobile assessments, compared to the international average of 42%.
However, more than 50% of those potential early adopters want research to support mobile assessments.
Since it’s an emerging area, there have only been a handful of studies done and so far, research shows that using different devices can lead to different results on certain tests, according to Ken Lahti, CEB’s product development and innovation vice president.
“When we have these mixed modalities, if those candidates are applying for the same jobs, we need to be sure that the tests work just as well on a mobile device as they do on a traditional online internet test," he said.
“The research shows that that’s not always the case. In particular, with assessments that are tapping into cognitive ability or problem-solving type skills, people perform a lot worse on those on a mobile device than they do on a regular online test on something other than a mobile device.
“If you had those candidates coming in and you were to deploy a cognitive ability test and allow people to take it on mobile, what you’d see is that these people would have a disadvantage in the application process and would score lower and would likely be screened out at a higher rate.”
The wide variety of places that people use their mobile devices is one of the potential explanations for why there are differences in test scores, said Lahti.
The way in which people use mobile devices – in small bursts, rather than for long periods – could also affect the levels of concentration needed to complete a difficult cognitive ability assessment or an overall job application process.
Other basic multiple choice tests that are not about problem solving tend to work the same on mobile and non-mobile devices, said Lahti.
There’s also the possibility that doing online tests on a mobile platform could give candidates a greater chance to cheat, with about 20% of those surveyed citing it as a potential issue.
“It is possible to cheat or try to cheat on any kind of unsupervised test that is delivered over the internet. Mobile might make that easier or more common because of where people tend to use their mobile devices. They tend to have them with them much more frequently and they tend to have them with them in a broader variety of situations than they would have typically had a laptop or a desktop,” said Lahti.
“So rather than just getting help in a deliberate fashion from a spouse or friend or someone who happens to be at their home, the fact that the application process is mobile means that they could be riding a bus or out at a café or anywhere and potentially get help from a wider variety of people who they might have access to.”
Would you let candidates do mobile assessments?
That means more jobseekers will be looking to use mobile technology for the job application process Australian recruiters are among the most likely in the world to embrace it, according to recent research.
But allowing job candidates to do online assessments on their mobile devices could lead to potential problems.
You might also like: Mobile usage of career sites up 75% in five months
Advisory company CEB’s Global Assessment Trends Report showed that 59% of recruiters in Australia and New Zealand would support the use of mobile assessments, compared to the international average of 42%.
However, more than 50% of those potential early adopters want research to support mobile assessments.
Since it’s an emerging area, there have only been a handful of studies done and so far, research shows that using different devices can lead to different results on certain tests, according to Ken Lahti, CEB’s product development and innovation vice president.
“When we have these mixed modalities, if those candidates are applying for the same jobs, we need to be sure that the tests work just as well on a mobile device as they do on a traditional online internet test," he said.
“The research shows that that’s not always the case. In particular, with assessments that are tapping into cognitive ability or problem-solving type skills, people perform a lot worse on those on a mobile device than they do on a regular online test on something other than a mobile device.
“If you had those candidates coming in and you were to deploy a cognitive ability test and allow people to take it on mobile, what you’d see is that these people would have a disadvantage in the application process and would score lower and would likely be screened out at a higher rate.”
You might also like: Mobile strategies the 'only option'
The wide variety of places that people use their mobile devices is one of the potential explanations for why there are differences in test scores, said Lahti.
The way in which people use mobile devices – in small bursts, rather than for long periods – could also affect the levels of concentration needed to complete a difficult cognitive ability assessment or an overall job application process.
Other basic multiple choice tests that are not about problem solving tend to work the same on mobile and non-mobile devices, said Lahti.
There’s also the possibility that doing online tests on a mobile platform could give candidates a greater chance to cheat, with about 20% of those surveyed citing it as a potential issue.
“It is possible to cheat or try to cheat on any kind of unsupervised test that is delivered over the internet. Mobile might make that easier or more common because of where people tend to use their mobile devices. They tend to have them with them much more frequently and they tend to have them with them in a broader variety of situations than they would have typically had a laptop or a desktop,” said Lahti.
“So rather than just getting help in a deliberate fashion from a spouse or friend or someone who happens to be at their home, the fact that the application process is mobile means that they could be riding a bus or out at a café or anywhere and potentially get help from a wider variety of people who they might have access to.”
Would you let candidates do mobile assessments?
You might also like: Smartphones: more hindrance than help?
